Hi,
On 2023-09-02 19:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On top of that, those two packages have already been rebuilt for
> > riscv64 (no binNMUs required there), whereas if we force another
> > upload only to solve this, we will trigger a build for every arch and
> > needlessly consume at the very
Hi
On 2023-09-02 18:27:39 +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Hello Sebastian anb Paul,
>
> > So let's not just rebuild those. Samuel, please file bugs against those
> > packages so that the maintainers fix the build dependencies.
>
> I have filled bugs already, here's the current situation:
>
> eg
Hello Sebastian anb Paul,
> So let's not just rebuild those. Samuel, please file bugs against those
> packages so that the maintainers fix the build dependencies.
I have filled bugs already, here's the current situation:
eg25-manager:
https://bugs.debian.org/1043547
Has been fixed in git already
On 2023-09-01 19:45:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01-09-2023 14:25, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > These packages have a build dependency on the virtual package
> > "libcurl4-dev", which is satisfiable by any variant of the curl
> > binaries (openssl, gnutls, nss).
>
> Policy 7.5 [1] says
Hi,
On 01-09-2023 14:25, Samuel Henrique wrote:
These packages have a build dependency on the virtual package
"libcurl4-dev", which is satisfiable by any variant of the curl
binaries (openssl, gnutls, nss).
Policy 7.5 [1] says that "To specify which of a set of real packages
should be the def
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hello Sebastian, I'm sending this same response to all 3 bugs related to this.
> Why does that require rebuilds?
These packages have a build dependency on the virtual package
"libcurl4-dev", which is satisfiable by any variant of the curl
binaries (openssl, gnutls, ns
6 matches
Mail list logo
