On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 12:54:17 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> But a really good solution this is not.
Yeah, I feel that's a slight understatement. A few of my users are on
backported kernels because they have new hardware and we haven't found
time to migrate our software stack to bookworm yet. One
Package: linux-headers-amd64
Followup-For: Bug #1051087
X-Debbugs-Cc: spm-deb...@lebernie.net
Dear Maintainer,
Thank you for this clarification, this is much clearer now.
Regards,
LB.
Hi Laurent
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Laurent BRULET wrote:
> It's still not entirely clear to me, whether this transient issue (where
> linux-
> image-amd64 can be installed while the corresponding linux-headers-amd64
> can't)
> is a "standard case" for backports, or it is an
Package: linux-headers-amd64
Followup-For: Bug #1051087
X-Debbugs-Cc: spm-deb...@lebernie.net
Dear Maintainer,
Thank you for your quick reply.
It's still not entirely clear to me, whether this transient issue (where linux-
image-amd64 can be installed while the corresponding linux-headers-amd64
Package: linux-headers-amd64
Version: 6.1.27-1~bpo11+1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: spm-deb...@lebernie.net
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that linux-headers-amd64 package (6.1.27-1~bpo11+1) from
bullseye-backports cannot be installed. Because it depends on
linux-headers-6.1.0-0.deb11.9-amd64
5 matches
Mail list logo
