Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 12/11/2023 15.21, Adam Majer wrote: On 2023-11-10 10:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote: The module should continue to work on 6.1 The module should continue to work on 6.5 booted with ibt=off The module should fail to load with an error message describing the issue on 6.5 with ibt enabled, but

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-12 Thread Adam Majer
On 2023-11-10 10:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote: The module should continue to work on 6.1 The module should continue to work on 6.5 booted with ibt=off The module should fail to load with an error message describing the issue on 6.5 with ibt enabled, but without a kernel BUG. Did you find some

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Adam, On 04/11/2023 01.24, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Or you could simply install the -dkms package from https://people.debian.org/~anbe/1052069/ The module should continue to work on 6.1 The module should continue to work on 6.5 booted with ibt=off The module should fail to load with an error

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 03/11/2023 22.39, Adam Majer wrote: You need to specify ibt=off to kernel at boot time for the older nvidia modules to work. Since the kernel has this protection enabled by default, it will have to be disabled until such time as nvidia bothers to update/recompile these older drivers like

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-03 Thread Adam Majer
reopen 1052069 retitle -1 kernel oops on module load due to IBT=ON in recent kernels thanks On 2023-11-03 12:42, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Hi Adam, On 31/10/2023 22.06, Adam Majer wrote: So, what's the way to proceed here? Can we add the boot parameter when the legacy kernel module is to be

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-03 Thread Adam Majer
On 11/3/23 12:42, Andreas Beckmann wrote: I probably made a mistake while backporting some non-trivial changes for supporting recent kernels. With the availability of 470.223.02 I could verify my backport against the upstream version, drop a lot of unneeded bits and fix some discrepancies...

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-11-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Adam, On 31/10/2023 22.06, Adam Majer wrote: So, what's the way to proceed here? Can we add the boot parameter when the legacy kernel module is to be loaded on newer Intel processors? I probably made a mistake while backporting some non-trivial changes for supporting recent kernels. With

Bug#1052069: ways to proceed?

2023-10-31 Thread Adam Majer
Hi, So, what's the way to proceed here? Can we add the boot parameter when the legacy kernel module is to be loaded on newer Intel processors? - Adam