Hi Thomas,
Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that maintaining large texmf trees plus their support
> structure (texdoctk database / updmap.cfg / fmtutil.cnf / ...) has a
> good future. It creates a lot of work and package based approaches have
> a lot of advantages. Therefor
Hi Frank+Thomas,
> Therefore, besides TEXMFLOCAL and the users' texmf trees, I'd like to
> have the possibility to include information that other packages¹ have
> dropped into /usr/share/texmf/texdoctk/, or into $TEXMFCONFIG/texdoctk
> if you prefer that.
I don't think that maintaining large te
Thomas Ruedas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have implemented such a feature as suggested for the local and home
> texmf trees and send you a version of texdoctk to try it out, if you
> want. Comments are welcome.
Great, that looks very good.
> I have informed Thomas Esser about that to learn
Thomas Ruedas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Saturday 27 August 2005 17:54, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Matthew suggested (actually long ago) that TeX packages and TeX-related
> [...]
>> similar into its directory and read the information from this file,
>> merging all files it finds there.
>> W
4 matches
Mail list logo
