Control: severity -1 important.
With https://bugs.debian.org/1058822 >, this issue became
release critical.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
[Kari Pahula]
> I guess 2.1.0 would work out of the box with LLVM 16, but I'd wager
> it's still much closer to working with LLVM 17 than Triton 2.0.0 would
> be.
I tested building 2.1.0 in unstable a few days ago, and could not get it
to build, so my guess is different.
--
Happy hacking
Petter
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:25:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I tried switching to a newer llvm package, but it seem to me the
> libmlir-14-dev and mlir-14-tools content changed in a way that break the
> build with newer llvm versions. Not sure how to work around this, not
> skilled
[Sylvestre Ledru]
> As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
> archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17.
>
> This package depends on 14.
I would be happy to, but...
I tried switching to a newer llvm package, but it seem to me the
libmlir-14-dev and
Source: triton
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17.
This package depends on 14.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
5 matches
Mail list logo
