On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:04:59PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> > This does fix the build failure. I was about to push such a change to the
> > repo and do a maintainer upload, since I've never been removed from the
> > uploaders field after all these years ;) Do you want me to do this, or
> >
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 07:33:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug is also reproducible on the armel and armhf release archs as a
result of the time_t transition, so bumping this to serious.
ACK.
This does fix the build failure. I was about to push such a change to the
repo and do a
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Ryan,
This bug is also reproducible on the armel and armhf release archs as a
result of the time_t transition, so bumping this to serious.
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 06:04:45PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Would you be willing to test build the attached patch on hppa?
Would you be willing to test build the attached patch on hppa? I've
tested it on amd64 with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration appended.
thanks,
Ryan
>From fa0b704371762bdc479a5d8dc6a0a6df4ec3a52e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Tandy
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:58:15 -0800
Subject:
On 2024-03-07 7:21 p.m., Ryan Tandy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:29:54PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
The binNMUs succeeded on several release arches already. I'm not sure why hppa would be different. I see
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration in its compiler commands, but I don't know where
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:29:54PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
The binNMUs succeeded on several release arches already. I'm not sure
why hppa would be different. I see
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration in its compiler commands, but I
don't know where it's coming from.
I remembered later
The implicit declaration occurs on all arches, but it's a warning, not
an error. For example on amd64:
smbk5pwd.c:917:23: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx’; did you mean ‘kadm5_init_with_password_ctx’?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
917 |
--On Thursday, March 7, 2024 5:41 PM + John David Anglin
wrote:
Source: openldap
Version: 2.5.13+dfsg-5+b4
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
See:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openldap=hppa=2.5
.13%2Bdfsg-5%2Bb4=1709830559=0
smbk5pwd.c: In function
Source: openldap
Version: 2.5.13+dfsg-5+b4
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
See:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openldap=hppa=2.5.13%2Bdfsg-5%2Bb4=1709830559=0
smbk5pwd.c: In function ‘smbk5pwd_modules_init’:
smbk5pwd.c:917:23: error: implicit declaration of
9 matches
Mail list logo
