Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 06:35:06PM +, Kari Lempiäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like this fixed the problem. I ran a couple of backup jobs to
> cifs-mounted shares and no error messages so far. Thanks!
Thanks for the confirmation!
Regards,
Salvatore
Hi,
Looks like this fixed the problem. I ran a couple of backup jobs to
cifs-mounted shares and no error messages so far. Thanks!
Regards,
Kari
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso on behalf of
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Date: Tuesday, 7. May 2024 at 19.01
To: Kari Lempiäinen
Cc: 1069...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 03:30:58PM +, Kari Lempiäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> New kernel 6.1.0-21 seems to be out. Could you verify if this bus is fixed in
> it?
>
> I found from
> https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.1.90 that
> there is a commit
Hi,
New kernel 6.1.0-21 seems to be out. Could you verify if this bus is fixed in
it?
I found from
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.1.90 that
there is a commit b3686200adba26dd1f8beee3d9c1b34563db1e65 is that a fix for
this?
Regards,
Kari
From: Salvatore
Can confirm.
Have several VM's on the latest stable kernel that have this message.
Uname:
Linux host 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Fstab:
//nas/share /mnt/share cifs
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.85-1
Followup-For: Bug #1069102
X-Debbugs-Cc: email4deb...@gmx.net
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed the same issue.
I have a mount:
mount -t cifs //XXX/Backups/borg-backup /mnt/backups -o
noserverino,credentials=/etc/xxx,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777 -vvv
In the
Hi,
I probably could try it. The problem is that I don't have extra computer at the
moment and I should do it on my main server. There is also a Virtualbox host
running there, which needs to compile some parts of it every time the host
kernel is updated. For that it needs kernel-headers. I
Hi Kari,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 05:31:33AM +, Kari Lempiäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I spoke too soon. I removed 'noserverino' options from all
> my cifs mounts yesterday and u/remounted them. From last night
> syslog I can still find the "directory entry name would overflow
> frame end
Hi,
I think I spoke too soon. I removed 'noserverino' options from all my cifs
mounts yesterday and u/remounted them. From last night syslog I can still find
the "directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf" entries.
I have options like this in my fstab:
//mercury/backups
Hi,
I can confirm that removing the 'noserverino' mount option fixed the problem
for me. Unfortunately, I don't have suitable environment at the moment for
testing kernel-fixes...
Best regads,
Kari
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso
Sent: 16 April 2024 23:49
To:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:49:54PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> > > Package:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 6.1.85-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> >*
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.85-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20
>
>* What exactly
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.85-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
out system mounted a samba share via autofs (cifs) and
14 matches
Mail list logo
