Hi Simon,
On 2024-05-01 11:36:56 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > IMHO, for additional version information, the Debian changelog is a
> > good place for the user + output from a standard command providing
> > the version, e.g. "gnulib-tool --version". Scripts can use
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> Thanks for the explanations. However, I think that it is not the
> goal of the Debian version string to entirely reflect all the
> Debian-side and upstream-side versions involved. This may be a
> good idea when the obtained version string is short enough
Hi Simon,
On 2024-04-19 09:13:01 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> > Package: gnulib
> > Version: 20240412~dfb7117+stable202401.20240408~aa0aa87-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > A long package version is annoying for the user (for the "dpkg -l"
> > output and other
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> Package: gnulib
> Version: 20240412~dfb7117+stable202401.20240408~aa0aa87-2
> Severity: normal
>
> A long package version is annoying for the user (for the "dpkg -l"
> output and other reasons). I doubt that such a long version is
> necessary;
Hi Vincent and thanks for
Package: gnulib
Version: 20240412~dfb7117+stable202401.20240408~aa0aa87-2
Severity: normal
A long package version is annoying for the user (for the "dpkg -l"
output and other reasons). I doubt that such a long version is
necessary; I'm wondering whether it is intended or is due to a
bug in a
5 matches
Mail list logo
