Hi!
* John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [Tue Jun 11, 2024 at 02:18:33PM +0200]:
> On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 13:42 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > I had a look at this, and it seems like this package has never really
> > > worked on ARM systems at all? And this was hidden due to the missing
> > >
Hi Guillem,
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 13:42 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I had a look at this, and it seems like this package has never really
> > worked on ARM systems at all? And this was hidden due to the missing
> > declarations not being an error.
> >
> > AFAIK, only x86 (i386 and amd64),
Control: tag -1 patch
[ CCing debian-arm list to loop them into the porting issue. ]
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 14:42:18 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 14:56:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: libx86emu
> > Version: 3.5-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification:
Hi!
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 14:56:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libx86emu
> Version: 3.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid,
Source: libx86emu
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2
5 matches
Mail list logo