Actually, does either javawrapper or even jarwrapper make sense these days now
that openjdk already register jar files in binfmts?
Granted, jarwrapper does at least one thing better than openjdk: it provides a
proper jar detector, while openjdk relies only on magic numbers. Which matches
not
file. This still seems as though it could be useful in some situations=
=2E
=20
CCing the javatools maintainers; would it be possible to merge some of
the functionality of
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/code/javawrapper/javawrappe=
r-1.0.tar.gz
into jarwrapper?
=20
Thanks,
=20
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:35:14PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
I noticed this very old bug and wondered if it is still relevant.
Currently there is a jarwrapper package that uses binfmt-support to
allow jar-files to be executed.
Almost. It's probably more use to most people than my
Hi
I noticed this very old bug and wondered if it is still relevant.
Currently there is a jarwrapper package that uses binfmt-support to
allow jar-files to be executed.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo
