Bug#149052: manpage bugs in at

2011-01-27 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Reuben Thomas writes: > Attached, the promised patch against git HEAD to address points 5, 6 and 8. > > I hope you don't mind, the patch automatically (thanks to Emacs) > contains some whitespace cleanup, but there's not much of it, and it > doesn't obscure the actual patches. Applied (with a min

Bug#149052: manpage bugs in at

2011-01-27 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 27 January 2011 15:03, Reuben Thomas wrote: > 2011/1/27 Ansgar Burchardt : >> 5,6) Still needs to be changed. Maybe move to it's own section about >>   access control. > > I think this section should be moved to at.allow(5). I will submit a > patch against git separately. >> 8,9) Still needs to

Bug#149052: manpage bugs in at

2011-01-27 Thread Reuben Thomas
2011/1/27 Ansgar Burchardt : > > I just took a look at the original bug report and fixed some of the > issues. Great, thanks! I agree that points 1-4 and 7 can be considered fixed. That leaves 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. > 5,6) Still needs to be changed. Maybe move to it's own section about >   access co

Bug#149052: manpage bugs in at

2011-01-26 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Reuben Thomas writes: > In “valid queue designations range from a to z. and A to Z.”, the > first period (after “a to z”) should be a comma. Fixed. > Is there some problem fixing this bug, or at least fixing some of the > points made? It’s just a bit of man page correction! If you need some > he

Bug#149052: manpage bugs in at

2010-12-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
Package: at Version: 3.1.12-1ubuntu2 Severity: normal Another minor typo: In “valid queue designations range from a to z. and A to Z.”, the first period (after “a to z”) should be a comma. Is there some problem fixing this bug, or at least fixing some of the points made? It’s just a bit of man p