# I removed Ishikawa-san and Niibe-san from CC.
# Because their mail address is dead.
Hi, Bill.
Thank you for following.
I start work as had written to the email which I sent earlier.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:34:55PM -0400, Bill Traynor wrote:
> On 11-03-25 06:21 PM,
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:21:16PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Wed, 08, Jul, 2009 at 09:45:29AM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
> > I guess the bigger questions would be "why bother?" Given the limited
> > number of Linux hackers I know of working on SuperH as it is, spending
> > time on
On 11-03-25 06:21 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Wed, 08, Jul, 2009 at 09:45:29AM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
I guess the bigger questions would be "why bother?" Given the limited
number of Linux hackers I know of working on SuperH as it is, spending
time on support for newer hardware would see
On Wed, 08, Jul, 2009 at 09:45:29AM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
> I guess the bigger questions would be "why bother?" Given the limited
> number of Linux hackers I know of working on SuperH as it is, spending
> time on support for newer hardware would seem wiser.
Hi,
So is there a consensus
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 23:15, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/6/22 Bill Traynor :
>>
>>>
>>> I made a page of SH4 port.
>>
>> Is your page different from the link here:
>> http://debian.org/ports/#unreleased which points back to
>> www.linux-sh.org?
>
> I'll second that.
>
>>
>>> However,
Hi,
2009/6/22 Bill Traynor :
>
>>
>> I made a page of SH4 port.
>
> Is your page different from the link here:
> http://debian.org/ports/#unreleased which points back to
> www.linux-sh.org?
I'll second that.
>
>> However, these are not yet enough.
>>
>>>
>>> While at it, can we consider consensu
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:23, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi, Luca.
>
> 2009/6/20 Luca Bruno :
>> [Sorry for the long CC: list, I was unsure about subscribers]
>>
>> So, even if this report is quite old, it looks like something is
>> currently moving.
>> This mail is just to ping all interested par
Hi, Luca.
2009/6/20 Luca Bruno :
> [Sorry for the long CC: list, I was unsure about subscribers]
>
> So, even if this report is quite old, it looks like something is
> currently moving.
> This mail is just to ping all interested parties and sum up relevant
> references.
>
> In a recent thread[1],
[Sorry for the long CC: list, I was unsure about subscribers]
So, even if this report is quite old, it looks like something is
currently moving.
This mail is just to ping all interested parties and sum up relevant
references.
In a recent thread[1], there were initial discussions about first
integ
9 matches
Mail list logo
