Bug#172436: [PROPOSAL] web browser url viewing

2008-04-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: I have gotten no further feedback on this proposal other than Clint's note that he finds this better-specified than the original ESR BROWSER specification, but hesitates to comment further since he doesn't use

Bug#172436: [PROPOSAL] web browser url viewing

2008-03-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They

Bug#172436: [PROPOSAL] web browser url viewing

2008-03-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They don't seem obviously necessary to me and are

Bug#172436: [PROPOSAL] web browser url viewing

2008-01-02 Thread Clint Adams
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:08:30PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They don't seem obviously

Bug#172436: [PROPOSAL] web browser url viewing

2008-01-01 Thread Russ Allbery
The BROWSER environment variable proposal is another wording proposal that's been sitting in the Policy bug queue for quite some time with plenty of seconds and a concrete wording proposal. I'd like to resurrect this discussion and put it permanently to rest one way or the other. Copying Joey as