Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
I have gotten no further feedback on this proposal other than Clint's
note that he finds this better-specified than the original ESR BROWSER
specification, but hesitates to comment further since he doesn't use
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes
that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL
canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes
that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL
canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They
don't seem obviously necessary to me and are
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:08:30PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes
that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL
canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They
don't seem obviously
The BROWSER environment variable proposal is another wording proposal
that's been sitting in the Policy bug queue for quite some time with
plenty of seconds and a concrete wording proposal. I'd like to resurrect
this discussion and put it permanently to rest one way or the other.
Copying Joey as
5 matches
Mail list logo