tag 23 patch
thanks dude
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
I do not intend to work on it until summer, when it becomes clear
which compiler versions are included in etch. maybe these are 2.95,
3.4 and 4.1. who knows ...
I'm happy to include any patches before that, if you are
tags 23 - patch
thanks
Mohammed Adnène Trojette writes:
tag 23 patch
thanks dude
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
I do not intend to work on it until summer, when it becomes clear
which compiler versions are included in etch. maybe these are 2.95,
3.4 and 4.1. who
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources,
so that the package still builds. The idea is to replace these files
with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile
don't have to be patched.
Unless I am
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, there was a Debian General Resolution lately
that allows GFDL'd documents in main, provided they have no
front-cover text, no back-cover text and no invariants. I am
concerned that wholesale deletion of all documentation from
Ludovic Brenta writes:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources,
so that the package still builds. The idea is to replace these files
with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile
don't have to
Matthias Klose wrote:
anyway, I'll wait until Debian's position on the GFDL is documented
somewhere and then address all these together.
It's pretty well documented by now. So is it time? :-P
I'm sorry I haven't had the time or mental focus to write replacement
manpages, but the {cpp, gcc, g++}
Nathanael Nerode writes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
anyway, I'll wait until Debian's position on the GFDL is documented
somewhere and then address all these together.
It's pretty well documented by now. So is it time? :-P
I'm sorry I haven't had the time or mental focus to write replacement
7 matches
Mail list logo
