Bug#211458: classpath: provide static libraries

2005-02-22 Thread Michael Koch
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:46:50PM -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Michael Koch wrote: I really wonder why you want static libraries instead of dynamic ones. What is the need for this ? GCJ doesnt need them. It has its own shared library and some free VMs (jamvm, sablevm,

Bug#211458: classpath: provide static libraries

2005-02-22 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Michael Koch wrote: I really wonder why you want static libraries instead of dynamic ones. What is the need for this ? GCJ doesnt need them. It has its own shared library and some free VMs (jamvm, sablevm, kissme, cacao, etc.) use the share JNI libraries provided by classpath

Bug#211458: classpath: provide static libraries

2005-02-21 Thread Michael Koch
Hi Scott, I really wonder why you want static libraries instead of dynamic ones. What is the need for this ? GCJ doesnt need them. It has its own shared library and some free VMs (jamvm, sablevm, kissme, cacao, etc.) use the share JNI libraries provided by classpath itself. Michael -- To