Just for reference, below is the status of knetbsd. Drew Daniels
----- Forwarded message from Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:17:56 -0600 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,328,1125896400"; d="scan'208"; a="99097087:sNHT36036224" From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Cc: Glibc/k*BSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: knetbsd maintained? want glibc patched for it? Organisation: free as in freedom X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1032; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on Zimmer X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:55:04PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > Hi, > Is Debian knetbsd maintained? I know it's nowhere near where Debian > kfreebsd is. I ran across the following in bug 213503 that may be of > interest to those interested in Debian knetbsd. I haven't checked at all > to see if glibc has been patched for knetbsd, but if it has, then the > bug could use an update. No, it's not currently maintained. However, since it's also based on Glibc I believe it can be reinstated with minimal effort. Most of the work that has been done on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD can be re-used. -- Robert Millan ----- End forwarded message ----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]