posted mailed
Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
Hello members of debian-legal,
It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.
We know. ;-)
Currently web pages are Copyright ©
posted mailed
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Francesco!
You wrote:
A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
I'm afraid that this will turn
Tommi Vainikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does missing paperwork create a problem?
Strictly speaking, yes.
And what would be good license for Debians web pages?
MIT/Expat or GNU GPL.
Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board
meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:28:47 +0200 Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Francesco!
You wrote:
A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and
simply asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be
tracked, contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
I'm
Hello members of debian-legal,
It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.
Currently web pages are Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI and license terms
linking to Open Publication license
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:17:35 +0300 Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
Hello members of debian-legal,
Hi!
It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.
Indeed.
Currently web pages
Hi Francesco!
You wrote:
A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
I'm afraid that this will turn out to be infeasable. Lots and lots of
7 matches
Mail list logo
