block 638791 by 24043
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:53:27PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote [edited]:
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org (11/03/2011):
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9
What's the status? What needs to be done to keep the ball rolling?
reconf-inetd, the proposed
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org (29/08/2011):
reconf-inetd, the proposed replacement of update-inetd, must be implemented
and accepted to the archive. the implementation is half-way there (see
reconf-inetd at git.d.o) but I don't expect to have something to upload before
the end of the year
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:57:51PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote [edited]:
Supposedly you're trying to write on alioth.debian.org while you should
be trying to write on svn.debian.org (beware of catch-all entries in
~/.ssh/config and the like)?
nope, I'm using
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org (29/08/2011):
nope, I'm using svn+ssh://s...@svn.debian.org/svn/dep/web
seems like a server-side issue:
Sendingdeps/dep9.mdwn
Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory
Hi,
coming around here because I'd be interested in having IPv6 support
again in approx (used to have it back in the days it shipped a
standalone server), aka. #527397.
Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org (11/03/2011):
You're right Eric. This is one of the major issues DEP9 aims to address.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:18:33AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
tags 24043 + ipv6
thanks
This ancient bug makes it impossible to add entries for the same
service for both tcp and tcp6. I've only tagged it, but perhaps the
severity should be raised too.
You're right Eric. This is one of the
tags 24043 + ipv6
thanks
This ancient bug makes it impossible to add entries for the same
service for both tcp and tcp6. I've only tagged it, but perhaps the
severity should be raised too.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
7 matches
Mail list logo
