Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just looked, and the last upload was 2003, the standards version > is out of date quite a bit, the section is overriden and there are > three patches in the BTS. What is you status of maintenance? If you > are low on time, maybe ask for a co-maintainer?
That's a good question. I'm really not sure what to do about psutils. I've been trying to decide for a while if I wanted to orphan it, and I've been leaning in that direction. As it stands now, there hasn't been any upstream work on psutils in a long time, and my impression from the last time I spoke with the author was that he wasn't sure when he might be able to work on it heavily again. It also looks like a number of the bugs may require someone with quite a bit more postscript expertise than I have (or than I may want to acquire soon). And finally, I have been wondering about the current status of the domain. Is psutils still needed, or are there better, more actively pursued alternatives now? For example, can similar functionality often be provided by convenience wrappers around ghostscript, as suggested in #159888? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
