also sprach Luar Roji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.20.2146 +0200]:
Maybe (only maybe!) we can make a NEW version of netstat, and show a warning
when chopping is happening, so we don't break actual scripts, and in the new
version we can do what we want without being afraid, what do you think? In
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.19.1125 +0200]:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
I don't want to have to rely on a width switch. I'd say that netstat
should output line-oriented and stop
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.20.1244 +0200]:
That's fine for machine readable output, but what about human readable
output?
That's debateable. I find e.g. 'ip route list' output far better
than /sbin/route by now. The same applies to 'ip address list' vs.
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.19.1125 +0200]:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
I don't want to have to rely on a width switch. I'd say that netstat
should
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.20.1259 +0200]:
Address HWtype HWaddress Flags MaskIface
192.168.1.34 ether 00:17:31:64:23:c5 Ceth0
192.168.1.254ether 00:19:cb:43:af:b7 Ceth0
This looks pretty
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.20.1244 +0200]:
That's fine for machine readable output, but what about human readable
output?
That's debateable. I find e.g. 'ip route list' output far better
than /sbin/route by now. The same applies to 'ip
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.20.1259 +0200]:
Address HWtype HWaddress Flags MaskIface
192.168.1.34 ether 00:17:31:64:23:c5 Ceth0
192.168.1.254ether 00:19:cb:43:af:b7 Ceth0
Luar Roji wrote:
I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
Before or after Lenny?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
I would preffer to keep the actual behaviour so no scripts are harmed. But
it's real that we don't want to have to add a new command line flag always
from now!
Now, another fact is that netstat was always tabular, and I think we are used
to
I think it's important enough to have it fixed in lenny, but don't know what
other people think about.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:50:59PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Luar Roji wrote:
I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
Before or after Lenny?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Luar Roji wrote:
I think it's important enough to have it fixed in lenny, but don't know what
other people think about.
I think it should've been fixed before Etch. ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
It's a bit unclear to me what Bernd's objections are and what he
intended to incorporate, so I kind of decided to delay this till after
lenny. But I
Luk Claes wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
It's a bit unclear to me what Bernd's objections are and what he
Yeah, it's unclear to me too. ;)
That was the core of the issue.
14 matches
Mail list logo
