tags 274677 + wontfix
thanks
In fact, I don't even have the intention of changing this tag against
the will of the maintainer, but I hope the maintainer will be kind
enough to explain how the official meaning of wontfix is appropriate
for this bug (I fail to see it).
Thanks.
--
To
Hello,
I think it'd be best for everyone, especially Debian, if you guys
calmed down
about this issue. Scott, surely you've got better reasons for tagging
this as
'wontfix' than personal problems with the reporter? Because that sure
isn't a
reason for a wontfix.
This bug is definitely easy
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 18:19 +0100, Manuel Menal wrote:
Scott, could you tell us if this patch is going to be applied,
Yes, either this or a very similar patch will be applied.
and when (next upload, perhaps ?)
In the 1.13 series, sometime over the next year.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In particular, the Maintainer knows all the bugs he's set at the
important severity are either hard to fix or would change things in
such a significant way that would break a lot of things right now.
So the Maintainer actually never bothers to
Coin,
Please consider this bug is _really_ annoying because it is a major
blocking problem for Debian GNU/Hurd packaging, thus the severity bump.
--
Marc Dequnes (Duck)
pgpACZvOokapm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:39 +0100, Marc Dequnes wrote:
Coin,
Who?
Please consider this bug is _really_ annoying because it is a major
blocking problem for Debian GNU/Hurd packaging, thus the severity bump.
Debian GNU/Hurd is not a released architecture.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt
6 matches
Mail list logo
