On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:25:00PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:32:25AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> > > This behaviour of MIME-tools (failing if an I/O operation fails) will
> > > *not* be changed; I've had discussions about this before.
> >
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:25:00PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:32:25AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> > > This behaviour of MIME-tools (failing if an I/O operation fails) will
> > > *not* be changed; I've had discussions about this before.
> >
Colin Watson writes:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:32:25AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> > This behaviour of MIME-tools (failing if an I/O operation fails) will
> > *not* be changed; I've had discussions about this before.
> >
> > Silently permittion I/O operations to fail can be a security risk.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:54:17PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > > So, is bug.pl buggy ? If yes, how should it be fixed ?
> >
> > IO::Scalar is buggy. Its "flush" method should
4 matches
Mail list logo