Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-26 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:48:53AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Btw, wrt splitting ACL files, note that #378935 adds a new one (25_exim4-config_check_mail). I think some of the rules currently in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt could be moved into this one, with the added advantage that they would

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:48:53AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Btw, wrt splitting ACL files, note that #378935 adds a new one (25_exim4-config_check_mail). I think some of the rules currently in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt could be

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-26 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:59:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: Actually, it might be appropriate to move the helo given? check to the RCPT ACL as well. Do any of these broken, but widely used MTAs skip helo? No, they don't. So

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-07-20 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [reject after mail from: instead of rcpt to:] iirc (sorry no referrences) some MTAs will react strangely to rejects after MAIL FROM: (instead of RCPT), like marking the whole

Bug#378935: Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2006-07-20 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [reject after mail from: instead of rcpt to:] iirc (sorry no referrences) some MTAs will react strangely to

Bug#378935: Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-07-21 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [check for HELO] Ok. This is #378935 (I sent a patch before). May I check it in? It is ok with me, and can easily backed out again if Marc disagrees (and he has the final say on exim nowadays), so go ahead. thanks, cu andreas -- The

Bug#378935: Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-21 Thread Robert Millan
tags 378935 pending thanks On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Ok. This is #378935 (I sent a patch before). May I check it in? It is ok with me, and can easily backed out again if Marc disagrees (and he has the final say on exim nowadays), so go ahead. Ok,

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Millan
Btw, wrt splitting ACL files, note that #378935 adds a new one (25_exim4-config_check_mail). I think some of the rules currently in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt could be moved into this one, with the added advantage that they would be performed earlier, saving time and bandwidth. Some of them

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-07-20 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw, wrt splitting ACL files, note that #378935 adds a new one (25_exim4-config_check_mail). I think some of the rules currently in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt could be moved into this one, with the added advantage that they would be

Bug#287581: splitting ACLs

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2006-07-20 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw, wrt splitting ACL files, note that #378935 adds a new one (25_exim4-config_check_mail). I think some of the rules currently in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt could be