tags 288710 confirmed fixed-upstream
thanks
At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:48:16 +1000,
Nathan Scott wrote:
Maybe should this bug be untagged upstream then ?
Since its working on other versions of glibc (ie SLES9), odds are
its an upstream bug anyway (maybe not, but probably). At this
stage, I
Nathan Scott a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:58:45PM +0200, Xavier Hienne wrote:
Hi,
I too am encountering the very same bug on a 1900+ entry /home
directory. The bug is easily reproducible :
Yep, just tried it and it is indeed easy to hit with that test
An even easier way to reproduce it
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Xavier Hienne wrote:
Nathan Scott a écrit :
Let's reassign this bug to glibc, and ask those folks to take
a look at the problem.
Maybe should this bug be untagged upstream then ?
Since its working on other versions of glibc (ie SLES9), odds are
Hi,
I too am encountering the very same bug on a 1900+ entry /home
directory. The bug is easily reproducible :
$ mkdir /tmp/dir
$ cd /tmp/dir
$ for ((i=0; i2000; i++)); do mkdir $i; done
$ getfacl *
[...]
user::rwx
group::r-x
other::r-x
getfacl: Too many open files
getfacl: Too many open files
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:58:45PM +0200, Xavier Hienne wrote:
Hi,
I too am encountering the very same bug on a 1900+ entry /home
directory. The bug is easily reproducible :
Yep, just tried it and it is indeed easy to hit with that test
case, thanks. I've also tried this on a SLES9 machine
5 matches
Mail list logo
