On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 07:50:23AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:14:39AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to track this bug but can't reproduce it on amd64:
Right. I've been working with the submitter without much success. I
asked for a shell
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:48:43AM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:28:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i'm not familiar with the bug system, so i'm emailing you... sorry
if i was doing wrong...
Nope, this is good.
it's about the torsmo bug 290733:
Excellent news, I am copying upstream with your findings. And I
appologies for reporting that there was a new upstream release; I read
the numbers wrong, of course (the maintainer lowered the severity of
the bug, which allowed to to enter testing, thusly confusing me).
Thanks,
Justin
On Thu,
Hi,
I wanted to track this bug but can't reproduce it on amd64:
Linux frosties 2.6.8-frosties-1 #2 Sun Oct 3 22:06:03 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Get:1 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main torsmo 0.18-1 [37.7kB]
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:14:39AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to track this bug but can't reproduce it on amd64:
Right. I've been working with the submitter without much success. I
asked for a shell account but that wasn't a possibility. Coredumps
all indicate a stack
5 matches
Mail list logo