On 01.02.05 Prakash Countcham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Prakash,
Are you the submitter of http://bugs.debian.org/293183? Long quote
follows:
I described the following problem on fr.comp.text.tex.
When I compile the document
\documentclass{entcs}
\begin{document}
We do not consider
On 01.02.05 Prakash Countcham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Prakash,
Long quote follows:
I described the following problem on fr.comp.text.tex.
When I compile the document
\documentclass{entcs}
\begin{document}
We do not consider variables and quantifiers for the following reason:
in
Heiko Oberdiek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added the patch in the next version.
[...]
Thank you very much, Arnaud, this is indeed a bug and not intended.
It is fixed in the next version.
Is this version release-ready, so that it can get into teTeX-3.0 which
will be released soon?
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:13:50AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Heiko Oberdiek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added the patch in the next version.
[...]
Thank you very much, Arnaud, this is indeed a bug and not intended.
It is fixed in the next version.
Is this version release-ready,
Mercredi le 02 février 2005, vers 12:25:30 (CET), Frank Küster a
écrit:
if you're still interested in finding the reason for this bug, although
it's already fixed, here's a better minimal example which doesn't use
\footnotee.
Frank,
I tried the latest hyperref found on CTAN (v6.74m) and the
tags 293183 -fixed
tags 293183 -fixed-in-experimental
stop
Hallo Heiko,
mit der von Arnaud gelieferten Beispieldatei tritt das Problem hier mit
teTeX-beta_2.99.9 immer noch auf, und das enthält ein aktuelles
hyperref. Seine Beispieldatei und die beobachteten
Formatierungsänderungen hänge ich per
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The following code exhibits a similar bug, using only standard article
class and \refstepcounter:
%%
Mardi le 01 février 2005, vers 23:26:37 (CET), Prakash Countcham a
écrit:
What is the difference? Is it possible to see the difference in a
document that does not use this entcs.cls?
The difference is the number of letters on the second line. I think it is
possible to see the difference in a
tags 293183 fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Heiko Oberdiek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
In all three versions is is at the end of the second line.
Thus I cannot reproduce the problem.
Yes, it seems to exist only in the versions in tetex-2.0.2. With
tetex-2.99.9, all is well.
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I described the following problem on fr.comp.text.tex.
When I compile the document
\documentclass{entcs}
\begin{document}
We do not consider variables and quantifiers for the following reason:
in SEM each input clause
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the difference? Is it possible to see the difference in a
document that does not use this entcs.cls?
The difference is the number of letters on the second line. I think it is
possible to see the difference in a standard document, but I don't have
11 matches
Mail list logo
