Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.17.0814 +0100]: sed -e edit_stuff pubring.gpg pubring.gpg.tmp \ mv pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ \ mv pubring.gpg.tmp pubring.gpg I've just run against the problem again, and it's definitely related to a SIGINT. If I look at your

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-21 Thread Werner Koch
The strace show only that you interrupted gpg: 28203 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 28203 unlink(/home/madduck/.gnupg/pubring.gpg.lock) = 0 28203 unlink(/home/madduck/.gnupg/.#lk0x81281d8.lapse.28203) = 0 and it cleaned up the lock file. The .tmp file won't get cleaned up in such

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.21.1045 +0100]: 28203 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 28203 unlink(/home/madduck/.gnupg/pubring.gpg.lock) = 0 28203 unlink(/home/madduck/.gnupg/.#lk0x81281d8.lapse.28203) = 0 and it cleaned up the lock file. The .tmp file won't

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-21 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:37:49AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.21.1045 +0100]: 28203 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 28203 unlink(/home/madduck/.gnupg/pubring.gpg.lock) = 0 28203

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-17 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:37, martin f krafft said: -rw--- 1 madduck madduck 16490496 2006-08-13 14:36 pubring.gpg -rw--- 1 madduck madduck 3546722 2006-08-14 08:23 pubring.gpg.tmp -rw--- 1 madduck madduck 17968679 2006-08-12 18:53 pubring.gpg~ FYI: When updating a keyring, gpg

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1546 +0100]: fyi, drop [0] into your $PATH before /usr/bin and make it 755. I've been running this now for a few days and I've seen loads of strangeness, but could not pinpoint an error now. At first, pubring.gpg~ got left over every few

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1520 +0100]: madduck mh, i guess i'll set mutt to run strace instead of gpg. fyi, drop [0] into your $PATH before /usr/bin and make it 755. 0. http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/.bin__gpg -- Please do not send copies of list mail to

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-11 Thread martin f krafft
severity 293556 grave thanks It just did it again. I am thus making the bug RC. Also see: madduck so losing pubring.pgp is data loss, right? weasel .oO( no, it's normal gnupg behaviour ) kink you could consider it to be only a cache weasel kink: no. weasel or well, you could. but you'ld

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-11 Thread James Troup
tags 293556 + unreproducible moreinfo help thanks martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: severity 293556 grave thanks It just did it again. I am thus making the bug RC. Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg and I've often interrupted it while it was

Bug#293556: data loss - RC

2006-08-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1853 +0100]: Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg and I've often interrupted it while it was fetching a key. If you want anything to happen to this bug, more information is definitely going to be needed. I