Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-24 Thread Martin Orr
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:58:27AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:53:49PM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: Martin Orr said: Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top? That's my planned fix, yes. :) That doesn't sound to me like the

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-23 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:53:49PM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: Martin Orr said: Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top? That's my planned fix, yes. :) That doesn't sound to me like the correct solution to this bug, though. The problem is that autoconf gets invoked

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-23 Thread Adam Conrad
tags 295428 pending thanks Jeroen van Wolffelaar said: That doesn't sound to me like the correct solution to this bug, though. The problem is that autoconf gets invoked without making sure the right autoconf is invoked. I assume you got appropriately schooled about how the autoconf wrapper

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-15 Thread Martin Orr
Package: apache2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I have built recently built versions 2.0.53-{1,2,3} of apache2 successfully. However version 2.0.53-4 fails, the output ending with: checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g...

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-15 Thread Adam Conrad
Martin Orr said: ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_LANG_PROGRAM Does it build if you remove autoconf2.13? ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

2005-02-15 Thread Adam Conrad
Martin Orr said: Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top? That's my planned fix, yes. :) ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]