Bug#295477: autofs.postinst vs. debconf

2005-02-16 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:21:47PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > I ran into this too. In general, maintainer scripts that use debconf > and start background processes (particularly daemons that will run > indefinitely) should first call db_stop to avoid trouble. Aha, db_stop is the problem. I'll

Bug#295477: autofs.postinst vs. debconf

2005-02-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: autofs Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-1 Followup-For: Bug #295477 I ran into this too. In general, maintainer scripts that use debconf and start background processes (particularly daemons that will run indefinitely) should first call db_stop to avoid trouble. However, AFAICT, autofs's postin