On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:18:48 +0100
Christoph Pleger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course it is a good idea to let other people look at my suggestion,
> because I am not absolutely sure that it does introduce a security
> hole. But I am quite sure.
Oops, a funny mistake. What I meant was of cour
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:06:38 +0100
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, introducing such a helper program can introduce a security hole if
> not done carefully, also, with pam it's afaik usually expected that
> the calling program makes sure it's root, rather than the pam module
retitle 295526 libpam_unix2 only works as root
thanks
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:33:59PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I discovered that various screen locking programs (xlock, kcheckpass,
> xscreensaver, vlock) have problems to authenticate a user when using
> pam_unix2. The reason
Package: libpam-unix2
Version: 1.25-1
Hello,
I discovered that various screen locking programs (xlock, kcheckpass,
xscreensaver, vlock) have problems to authenticate a user when using
pam_unix2. The reason was evident for me: these programs are not setuid
root.
But I wondered why the programs a
4 matches
Mail list logo
