Bug#297275: beast: Get rid of terminal mangling

2005-03-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Tim Janik wrote: thanks, i've applied the following patch upstream: That looks generally fine, except that (depending on what portability you want), backtics are more portable than $(tput). + gxx_columns=$(tput cols) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net

Bug#297275: beast: Get rid of terminal mangling

2005-03-06 Thread Tim Janik
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Thomas Dickey wrote: Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so any characters appearing are being put out by ncurses. that in turn uses escape sequences from the terminal description of your TERM environment variable which should match the capability set of konsole. What's the

Bug#297275: beast: Get rid of terminal mangling

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: beast Severity: wishlist Version: 0.6.2-3 When I build beast, the configure stage outputs some escape sequences: checking whether i386-linux-gcc supports -fno-keep-static-consts... yes ^[(B^[)0^[[?1049h^[[1;24r^[[m^O^[[4l^[[?7h^[[24;1H^[[?1049l^M^[[?1l^[checking whether i386-linux-gcc

Bug#297275: beast: Get rid of terminal mangling

2005-02-28 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: beast Severity: wishlist Version: 0.6.2-3 When I build beast, the configure stage outputs some escape sequences: checking whether i386-linux-gcc supports -fno-keep-static-consts... yes

Bug#297275: beast: Get rid of terminal mangling

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: beast Severity: wishlist Version: 0.6.2-3 When I build beast, the configure stage outputs some escape sequences: checking whether i386-linux-gcc supports -fno-keep-static-consts... yes