On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:29:18AM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
retitle 298020 parted: hfs(+) support is still poorly documented
tags 298020 +patch
thanks
I'm retitling to the bug to its original title, since in fact the info
manual is still affected. Jens Schmalzings patch from bug
Hi Sven,
Sven Luther wrote:
Doens't change a thing as regard to parted though, as it was frozen in
august.
Ah. I guess it's part of d-i? I'm not familiar with d-i organization.
It is producing a .udeb, yes, and furthermore, it is part of base or standard.
Ah, I darkly remember
Hi Sven,
now Sarge's frozen (whoohoo!) and it's time to fix remaining issues with
packages in Sarge. What about picking up this item, too?
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:15:29PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
the
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Hi Sven,
now Sarge's frozen (whoohoo!) and it's time to fix remaining issues with
packages in Sarge. What about picking up this item, too?
Huh, never even noticed. ... goes reading d-d-a, ... well, ok yes it is
frozen.
Doens't
retitle 298020 parted: hfs(+) support is still poorly documented
tags 298020 +patch
thanks
I'm retitling to the bug to its original title, since in fact the info
manual is still affected. Jens Schmalzings patch from bug #275650 was
incomplete and incorrect.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:30:58PM
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:23:25AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.11-8
Please try parted 1.6.21-1, which is now in testing/unstable.
No difference in the documentation regarding hfs(plus).
the info manual has been updated (see Bug
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:19:24PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:23:25AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.11-8
Please try parted 1.6.21-1, which is now in testing/unstable.
No difference in the documentation
Sven Luther wrote:
the info manual has been updated (see Bug #275650), but the package
description(s) *ouch!* and README.Debian still say parted does not
support
HFS(plus) resizing.
snip
I think the documentation should be fixed in Sarge. Will Sarge release
with parted
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:15:29PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
the info manual has been updated (see Bug #275650), but the package
description(s) *ouch!* and README.Debian still say parted does not
support
HFS(plus) resizing.
snip
I think the
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:23:25AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.11-8
Please try parted 1.6.21-1, which is now in testing/unstable.
Severity: normal
Hi,
the info manual has been updated (see Bug #275650), but the package
description(s) *ouch!* and
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.11-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
the info manual has been updated (see Bug #275650), but the package
description(s) *ouch!* and README.Debian still say parted does not support
HFS(plus) resizing.
Regards,
Nikolaus
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
11 matches
Mail list logo