Bug#298303: Re: Bug#298303: aide: statically linked but depends on libc (?)

2005-08-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:24:59PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote: You're probably absolutely right about the libc6 dependency not being there, now that I think it through. I suspect it is probably there out of sheer force of habit, where compiled binaries are concerned. Unless anyone raises

Bug#298303: aide: statically linked but depends on libc (?)

2005-04-08 Thread Mike Markley
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While building this package for the hurd-i386 architecture, I noticed that there is a hardcoded dependency on libc0.2, which does not exist. Then I noticed about the debian/mkdep script, which seems like a hack.

Bug#298303: aide: statically linked but depends on libc (?)

2005-03-06 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: aide Version: 0.10-6.1 You may consider this as a reopening of Bug #87597. While building this package for the hurd-i386 architecture, I noticed that there is a hardcoded dependency on libc0.2, which does not exist. Then I noticed about the debian/mkdep script, which seems like a hack.