Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-10 Thread Harald Dunkel
Harald Dunkel wrote: Attached you can find a patch. The patch was too much restricted to gawk. Attached you can find a better one. Regards Harri --- /u/harri/initrd-tools/initrd-tools-0.1.77/mkinitrd 2005-01-23 19:37:41.0 +0100 +++ mkinitrd2005-03-10 16:57:41.933283835 +0100 @@

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.77 As noted by Erik the ldd of glibc 2.3.3 provides a new output format breaking mkinitrd: # mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.11 2.6.11 cpio: /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x002a95556000): No such file or directory Seems that this new output format has

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.77 As noted by Erik the ldd of glibc 2.3.3 provides a new output format breaking mkinitrd: # mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.11 2.6.11 cpio: /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x002a95556000): No such file or

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Harald Dunkel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Remeber the gcc-3.4/4.0 archive is highly experimental and breaks all over the place. This is just another of its bugs. When I started using it, it wasn't experimental at all. It was the same as Unstable, but it used another compiler (gcc 3.4 instead of 3.3) to build

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Remeber the gcc-3.4/4.0 archive is highly experimental and breaks all over the place. This is just another of its bugs. When I started using it, it wasn't experimental at all. It was the same as Unstable, but it used

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Harald Dunkel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That is a 64bit sh. No linux-gate.so.1 there. You have to run ldd on a 32bit binary. If you have no chroot install ia32-libs and run [snip] Who mentioned 32bit? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That is a 64bit sh. No linux-gate.so.1 there. You have to run ldd on a 32bit binary. If you have no chroot install ia32-libs and run [snip] Who mentioned 32bit? Regards Harri I did. Thats the only point where the

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Harald Dunkel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That is a 64bit sh. No linux-gate.so.1 there. You have to run ldd on a 32bit binary. If you have no chroot install ia32-libs and run % ldd /emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.2.so /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) linux-gate.so.1 =

Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64

2005-03-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That is a 64bit sh. No linux-gate.so.1 there. You have to run ldd on a 32bit binary. If you have no chroot install ia32-libs and run % ldd /emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.2.so /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2