Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-05-03 Thread Alec Berryman
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. on 2005-04-29 09:55:33 -0700: On 04/29/05 12:31, Alec Berryman wrote: I've fixed this issue in my working copy of rzip Which did you change, the man page or the code? Not exactly an answer to your question, but 6 is the default in CVS, and Tridge knows better than

Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-04-29 Thread Alec Berryman
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. on 2005-04-28 13:58:02 -0700: Here's a one liner shell script which agrees with $ rzip -h that 6 is rzip's default compression level. Hi Kingsley, I've fixed this issue in my working copy of rzip; I've been waiting until I've finished #297701 (add long options)

Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-04-29 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Hi Alec, Thanks for following up. rzip is a top performer, and if I recall correctly, Andrew Tridgell said it shouldn't be too hard to make rzip forward compressed data to stdout so it works as a filter! It seems to me that with its outstanding performance, if it also became a filter, rzip