On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:56:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
That shouldn't be necessary -- all the locales in Debian agree with C
on ASCII-only text.
Ah, that would be convenient. I've just done a quick test and they all
seem OK except vi_VN.TCVN (both with latest CVS and the release):
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:47:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patient explanation. I know it's too late, but ...
The locale based filename thing in hugs is also a concern, though, in my
opinion. Currently two packages build-depend on hugs: haskell-utils and
cpphs. I
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new
ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes
don't cause any breakage elsewhere.
What incompatibilities with GHC 6.2 and nhc98 1.16 have you discovered
that
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:12:55AM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new
ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes
don't cause any breakage elsewhere.
What
Thanks for the patient explanation. I know it's too late, but ...
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:41:02PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Given you suggest workarounds I'm going to assume this really means why
isn't the new hugs in sarge? and answer accordingly, but FWIW I don't
remember anything not on
5 matches
Mail list logo
