Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2006-08-23 Thread Markus Neteler
AFAIK the next not used could also be an ID (cat) with lower value than the current which would not be Auto increment but Auto decrement. -- Markus Neteler neteler itc it http://mpa.itc.it/markus/ ITC-irst - Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica MPBA - Predictive Models for Biol.

Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2006-08-23 Thread Markus Neteler
Ok, my assumtion was wrong but Hamish explained it earlier. Still next not used makes more sense. Markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-21 Thread Dan Jacobson
So the action is truely Next not used and not Auto increment. So, closing this bug could be considered appropriate? H Dan, anything further? Sure: please document that somewhere, e.g., in v.digit.html. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#305245: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-19 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:23:45PM +1200, Hamish wrote: Package: grass Version: 6.0.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #305245 The mode Next not used should be called Auto increment. the exact behavior in vector/v.digit/var.c: cat = cat_max_get ( var_geti(VAR_FIELD) ) + 1; var_seti (

Bug#305245: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-19 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:23:45PM +1200, Hamish wrote: ps - upstream bugs are best filed, discussed, and dealt with in the upstream bug tracker where all the upstream developers will at least see them: http://grass.ibiblio.org/bugtracking/bugreport.html It is common practice to forward

Bug#305245: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-19 Thread Steve Halasz
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:23:45PM +1200, Hamish wrote: ps - upstream bugs are best filed, discussed, and dealt with in the upstream bug tracker where all the upstream developers will at least see them:

Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-19 Thread Hamish
Package: grass Version: 6.0.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #305245 The mode Next not used should be called Auto increment. the exact behavior in vector/v.digit/var.c: cat = cat_max_get ( var_geti(VAR_FIELD) ) + 1; var_seti ( VAR_CAT, cat ); So if you manually digitize cat

Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-18 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: grass Version: 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 Tags: upstream Severity: minor File: /usr/lib/grass/bin/v.digit The mode Next not used should be called Auto increment. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305245: v.digit: Next not used should be called Auto increment

2005-04-18 Thread Hamish
Package: grass Version: 6.0.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #305245 The mode Next not used should be called Auto increment. the exact behavior in vector/v.digit/var.c: cat = cat_max_get ( var_geti(VAR_FIELD) ) + 1; var_seti ( VAR_CAT, cat ); So if you manually digitize cat 10 then the next