On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:04:10PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
(I'm resending this cuz I forgot to CC: everyone...)
Hi All,
IMO, this package should be dropped, as the wrapper script probably needs to
be rewritten, and the
package depends on stuff that is superceded by the
Hi All,
IMO, this package should be dropped, as the wrapper script probably needs to be
rewritten, and the package depends on stuff that is superceded by the
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java package.
IIRC, libxml-commons-resolver has hooks to provide catalog support for Saxon -
though I'm not
(I'm resending this cuz I forgot to CC: everyone...)
Hi All,
IMO, this package should be dropped, as the wrapper script probably needs to be
rewritten, and the package depends on stuff that is superceded by the
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java package.
IIRC, libxml-commons-resolver has hooks to
Package: saxon-catalog
Version: 20020210-0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error:
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 20020210-0.2
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 08:21:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: saxon-catalog
Version: 20020210-0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error:
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog
dpkg-buildpackage:
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
And classpath is going nowhere fast, because the current version of gjdoc
depends on kaffe, which is not built on arm.
Note that the gjdoc dependency is only needed when you want to generate
the documentation as published on
6 matches
Mail list logo
