Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-07 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2005, Nikolaus Rath wrote: It seems to use LIST without any arguments: It's impossible to deduce the interesting groups this way. I only have No Gnus v0.4 here, which sends GROUP commands for each subscribed group. Please see if Gnus

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005, Nikolaus Rath wrote: It seems to use LIST without any arguments: It's impossible to deduce the interesting groups this way. I only have No Gnus v0.4 here, which sends GROUP commands for each subscribed group. Please see if Gnus configuration options are set properly, check

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:59:59AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: group. Please see if Gnus configuration options are set properly, check gnus-read-active-file, it should be 'some or nil for instance. I do believe the vanilla Gnus configuration is to read the entire active file (it's used for

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-06-05 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005, Nikolaus Rath wrote: I'm using Gnus 5.10.7. Please tell me what you consider major, you probably don't want it completely ;-) Does your Gnus use LIST ACTIVE or GROUP on leafnode? Can you run debug logging (see below), ngrep,

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-05-16 Thread Matthias Andree
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Nikolaus Rath wrote: I'm using Gnus 5.10.7. Please tell me what you consider major, you probably don't want it completely ;-) Does your Gnus use LIST ACTIVE or GROUP on leafnode? Can you run debug logging (see below), ngrep, ethereal to find that out? If it uses LIST

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-05-11 Thread Matthias Andree
Mark, Please reopen the bug report and promote it from wishlist to normal status. Nikolaus, This is a bug that was supposed to be fixed in 1.10.8, from NEWS: | ### BUGFIX | - Keep interesting groups interesting on LIST ACTIVE and GROUP even if | they have no articles. Reported by Brian

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-05-11 Thread Nikolaus Rath
This is a bug that was supposed to be fixed in 1.10.8, from NEWS: To resolve this bug, I need to reproduce it. Please provide details on your configuration: 1. leafnode configuration file, with passwords and user names stripped, (attached) ## Unread articles will be deleted after this

Bug#307685: #307685 leafnode: grouptimeout_* [group] = [days]

2005-05-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: | ### BUGFIX | - Keep interesting groups interesting on LIST ACTIVE and GROUP even if | they have no articles. Reported by Brian Sammon. Your wish lets me conclude the fix is either not working or not sufficient. This