On May 08, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why did ubuntu chose to fix it that way ?
They obviously have a different opinion about the tradeoffs.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:31:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 08, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why did ubuntu chose to fix it that way ?
They obviously have a different opinion about the tradeoffs.
Yep, they obviously care about their users, which debian seems more and
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:57:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, it would be nice to have those devices added per default in
links.conf, and the correct permissions set in permissions.rules.
I think you did not notice the
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure i did read it, it is still a shame that firewire webcam support will not
work out of the box with udev because of that. Adding a disclaimer saying you
don't care and don't want to be bothered by this is no solution. And if you
The point is
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:17:07PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure i did read it, it is still a shame that firewire webcam support will
not
work out of the box with udev because of that. Adding a disclaimer saying
you
don't care and
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh well, what are all thos other entries in links.conf for then ?
They needed are by drivers which are not hardware-related and cannot be
autoprobed or easily autoloaded.
I don't think it is against the kernel. But seriouly, why not have the
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:51:06PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
No, but I encourage Debian users to switch to it.
By making sure that debian is less functional than ubuntu ?
No, by explaining that for many uses it is a more useful distribution
than debian/stable.
Yeah, exact.
Debian's X
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian's udev sucks because it is not able to add the workaroud to make
firewire cameras work out of the box.
This is not an udev bug, and I explained my rationale for not adding a
workaround there. You should blame the 1394 maintainers instead,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:03:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian's udev sucks because it is not able to add the workaroud to make
firewire cameras work out of the box.
This is not an udev bug, and I explained my rationale for not adding a
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:03:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian's udev sucks because it is not able to add the workaroud to make
firewire cameras work out of the box.
This is not an udev bug, and I explained my rationale for not adding a
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-2
Severity: important
Hello,
As said, the /dev/raw1394 and /dev/video1394/0 devices are not existent in a
udev context. I understand this is because the ieee1394 driver doesn't yet
export the correct sys/hotplug magic.
In the meantime, it would be nice to have
11 matches
Mail list logo
