* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
I noticed you left the urgency low. Was that intentional, or can it be
raised to high, for the security fix?
Note that it's my first tpu, thus the mistakes I made.
I thought that the urgency was not that important as a manual
approvement was needed.
The fixed packages have been available for a week outside of debian. Is
a sponsor needed to upload them to Debian?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
The fixed packages have been available for a week outside of debian. Is
a sponsor needed to upload them to Debian?
Well, Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my sponsor for every
Bugzilla uploads.
He confirmed me he will upload the right sarge
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Note that the package on my repository was renamed:
http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge1_i386.changes
I followed Frankie's advices for making the t-p-u the right way.
For me, the package is ready for an
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Well, Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my sponsor for every
Bugzilla uploads.
He confirmed me he will upload the right sarge package ASAP. I guess the
upload was not done for basic time reasons.
Note that the package on my repository was renamed:
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Note that the package on my repository was renamed:
http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge1_i386.changes
I followed Frankie's advices for making the t-p-u the right way.
6 matches
Mail list logo
