Steve, Eloy, do we reassign this to one of Debian kernel packages as
well or just close it?
I've always reassigned such bugs to the kernel.
You've better knowledge than me about the right package to assign this
to. Could you take care of this.
I've just discovered a nasty and stupid
Andrew, are you listening here ?
You may have somme comments with you Samba team hat before I forward
this to Jerry. Any know performance issues with mount.cifs in Samba 3?
We seem to have a quite motivated bug reporter so this may be worth
investigating this deeper..:-)
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 07:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Andrew, are you listening here ?
You may have somme comments with you Samba team hat before I forward
this to Jerry. Any know performance issues with mount.cifs in Samba 3?
We seem to have a quite motivated bug reporter so this
Quoting Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 07:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Andrew, are you listening here ?
You may have somme comments with you Samba team hat before I forward
this to Jerry. Any know performance issues with mount.cifs in Samba 3?
We
Hello,
Quoting Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
None of this is a samba issue. mount.cifs is a simple helper binary
that starts the in-kernel cifs filesystem, the same results may be
obtained with a very simple 'mount' command.
The correct package for this bug is the kernel, and the
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 06:08:14PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 07:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Andrew, are you listening here ?
You may have somme comments with you Samba team hat before I forward
this to
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.14a-1
Severity: normal
I run a Linux box within a VMware, a Windows Server 2003 and a
Windows 2000 Server (both not in VMware).
When copying a CD image file from within Linux to a cifs mounted
Win2003 share, I see a very poor performance and high CPU load
(about 90%
7 matches
Mail list logo
