also sprach Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.13.1317 +0200]:
> Do we *really* want to diverge from upstream here? I know CACert is a
> great idea in theory, but Mozilla upstream has not added the certificate
> and they have a long list of good reasons for doing so.
Where? What are those rea
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:17:59AM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> Note that Epiphany users cannot opt out of using the CACert certificate
> because their certificate manager is broken.
>
> Do we *really* want to diverge from upstream here? I know CACert is a
> great idea in theory, but Mozilla upstrea
Note that Epiphany users cannot opt out of using the CACert certificate
because their certificate manager is broken.
Do we *really* want to diverge from upstream here? I know CACert is a
great idea in theory, but Mozilla upstream has not added the certificate
and they have a long list of good reas
* Duane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently I'm part of a team setting up a free certificate authority, as
> this has benefits over self signed certificates, especially as more and
> more people include our root certificate in their browsers.
>
Package: mozilla-firefox
Severity: wishlist
Currently I'm part of a team setting up a free certificate authority, as
this has benefits over self signed certificates, especially as more and
more people include our root certificate in their browsers.
You can visit our website at http://www.CAcert.o
5 matches
Mail list logo
