Bug#310380: libldap2: Same problem; slightly different fix

2005-05-31 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote: Well, with all this fuss about that symbolic link to libldap_r I'd say it is by far easier to make the libldap library a copy of libldap_r. @Steve: What do you think? It will cost a bit of disk space (if we don't hardlink which is evil as well)

Bug#310380: libldap2: Same problem; slightly different fix

2005-05-27 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Package: libldap2 Version: 2.1.30-8 Followup-For: Bug #310380 I'm seeing this, too (it's not an isolated report), but my fix was (very) slightly different: sincerity-forever:/usr/lib# ln -s libldap.so.2.0.130 libldap.so.2 Not sure why this isn't being done by the libldap2 package: dpkg

Bug#310380: libldap2: Same problem; slightly different fix

2005-05-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:25:39AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: I'm seeing this, too (it's not an isolated report), but my fix was (very) slightly different: sincerity-forever:/usr/lib# ln -s libldap.so.2.0.130 libldap.so.2 Well, with all this fuss about that symbolic link to