On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:22:32PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
For the first tests aspell do not need anything special, but if this becomes
more solid, code like
if [ $1 = configure ] ; then
if [ -x /usr/sbin/aspell-autobuildhash ]; then
aspell-autobuildhash
fi
fi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 12:54:13PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:54:50AM +0300, Brian Nelson wrote:
Wouldn't you want to clean up the obsolete dicts?
I don't really understand what you're trying to accomplish. Are you
trying to support *both* old school
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:31:19AM +0300, Brian Nelson wrote:
Are there any good reasons to not do require dicts to be autobuild,
aside from having to do a transition?
Not many, I think that even for today's low end computers aspell is
behaving quite efficiently building hashes. I tried in a
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:40:30PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:55:17PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
That makes the mirrors happy because the aspell dict is now arch:all, but
does not cause hashes being rebuilt if a new aspell with incompatible binary
hash format
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:55:17PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
That makes the mirrors happy because the aspell dict is now arch:all, but
does not cause hashes being rebuilt if a new aspell with incompatible binary
hash format is uploaded. That is what ispell-autobuildhash is currently
doing
Re: Agustin Martin in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to note that after Brian suggestion, one of the things that are waiting
in dictionaries-common for sarge release is aspell-autobuidhash, allowing the
binary hashes being built from dict postinst. This is still very
experimental, and would require
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:08:49PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Agustin Martin in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to note that after Brian suggestion, one of the things that are waiting
in dictionaries-common for sarge release is aspell-autobuidhash, allowing
the
binary hashes being built
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:22:32PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
...
should be added to aspell.postinst,
Typo:
s/aspell.postinst/aspell-bin.postinst/
as well as a compat string to file
/usr/share/aspell/aspell.compat. The format for that string is something
like
0.60_c1
where the
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:33:32PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
What is currently in
http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/aspell-autobuildhash
is pretty old. It tried to keep different aspell variants coexisting. Do not
try to test it, I wrote something newer and will put it there ASAP,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: aspell
Many aspell dictionaries depend on the libaspell15 package. with the
next soversion (or the coming C++ ABI change), the package name has to
be
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 12:26:45AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Agustin: What's the status of aspell-autobuildhash? I'd like to start
seriously testing it very soon, within the next couple of weeks, so that
we can start transitioning the dictionary packages as soon as sarge
releases.
I left
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
What is currently in
http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/aspell-autobuildhash
is pretty old. It tried to keep different aspell variants coexisting. Do not
try to test it, I wrote something newer and will put it there ASAP, for a
Package: aspell
Many aspell dictionaries depend on the libaspell15 package. with the
next soversion (or the coming C++ ABI change), the package name has to
be changed, as well as other 24 dictionary packages. That's just a
maintainance burden. Package dictionaries may depend on aspell (=
0.60)
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: aspell
Many aspell dictionaries depend on the libaspell15 package. with the
next soversion (or the coming C++ ABI change), the package name has to
be changed, as well as other 24 dictionary packages. That's just a
14 matches
Mail list logo
