Bug#310689: cdrecord -dev=ATA: -scanbus

2006-08-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Maximiliano Curia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was unable to reproduce with the latest version of the Debian cdrecord package. Be careful, the Debian package is rottemn in many aspects. It contains several Debian introduced bugs that _partially_ cancel each other. I recommend to test the

Bug#310689: cdrecord -dev=ATA: -scanbus

2006-08-02 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hello, I was unable to reproduce with the latest version of the Debian cdrecord package. Can you please test if you can still reproduce the bug? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310689: cdrecord -dev=ATA: -scanbus

2006-08-02 Thread A. Costa
Package: cdrecord Version: 4:2.01+01a03-5 Followup-For: Bug #310689 On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Can you please test if you can still reproduce the bug? I ran, as root: cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus /tmp/cdrec.dump2 21 Still seems buggy. The dump file is attached. HTH...

Bug#310689: cdrecord -dev=ATA: -scanbus

2006-08-02 Thread Maximiliano Curia
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:24, A. Costa wrote: On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Can you please test if you can still reproduce the bug? I ran, as root: cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus /tmp/cdrec.dump2 21 Still seems buggy. The dump file is attached. Ok, I've forgoten