It looks to me like gnome 2.10 is in testing. Is there any reason remaining
for me to hold off on making an NMU for libxklavier?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:13:08PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
It looks to me like gnome 2.10 is in testing. Is there any reason remaining
for me to hold off on making an NMU for libxklavier?
Uh... not at all. GNOME 2.10 has actually been in testing for a while --
sorry for not following
Le Vendredi 06 Janvier 2006 14:16, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:13:08PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
It looks to me like gnome 2.10 is in testing. Is there any reason
remaining for me to hold off on making an NMU for libxklavier?
Uh... not at all. GNOME 2.10 has
It would be beneficial if this bug is ignored for the time being, until
GNOME 2.10 reaches testing or there is another reason to reupload
libxklavier.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: libxklavier
Version: 2.0-0.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'libxklavier' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
xklavier_config.c:461: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of
'__builtin_strcmp' differ in signedness
xklavier_config.c:461:
5 matches
Mail list logo