Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-10-12 Thread Nico Schottelius
Seems to be fixed, at least I cannot reproduce it. Nico Stefan Hornburg [Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:47:13PM +0200]: On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:07:45 +0200 Nico Schottelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: jfsutils Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: critical Using fsck.jfs on my loopback file

Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-09-07 Thread Stefan Hornburg
Version: 1.1.8-1 On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 04:44:51 -0700 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Stefan, I just uploaded jfsutils 1.1.8-1. This upstream release is supposed to fix problems with journal replays. Can you please test if your problem still persists ? Since there has been no

Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-09-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Stefan, I just uploaded jfsutils 1.1.8-1. This upstream release is supposed to fix problems with journal replays. Can you please test if your problem still persists ? Since there has been no comment from the submitter in over two months, perhaps we should presume that this bug is closed in

Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-06-23 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:07:45 +0200 Nico Schottelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: jfsutils Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: critical Using fsck.jfs on my loopback file caused it multiply to segfault. I could 'fix' it by using --omit_journal_replay. I don't know in which state the

Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-06-22 Thread Nico Schottelius
Package: jfsutils Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: critical Using fsck.jfs on my loopback file caused it multiply to segfault. I could 'fix' it by using --omit_journal_replay. I don't know in which state the filesystem has to be to segfault fsck, but someone should check the log replay source. --