> The same way we removed the "enable md5" question a while ago (actually,
> Karl did it before we arrived), shouldn't we remove this question as well?
>
> Is there any situation where shadow is a bad thing? I mean, does someone
> somewhere on the earth really need this feature?
The template men
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > > We can obviously do this,
> > > however, I think that we should m
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Means that we enforce shadow passwords.
>
> Nope, it only enforce shadow if $2 is empty which only happens on
> firsttime installation or after someone purged the package.
Right, I
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Means that we enforce shadow passwords.
Nope, it only enforce shadow if $2 is empty which only happens on
firsttime installation or after someone purged the package.
> We can obviously do
> diff -ur shadow-4.0.3.orig/debian/passwd.preinst
> shadow-4.0.3/debian/passwd.preinst
> --- shadow-4.0.3.orig/debian/passwd.preinst 2005-06-30 09:46:29.881001537
> +0200
> +++ shadow-4.0.3/debian/passwd.preinst2005-06-30 09:29:17.920774693
> +0200
> @@ -29,7 +30,9 @@
> if
tag 316219 confirmed
thanks
I just created chroot (using pbuilder), and indeed, shadow is not enabled in
there.
Bye, Mt.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:35:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: passwd
> Version: 1:4.0.3-35
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please enable shadow by default on firsttime i
6 matches
Mail list logo
