James Youngman wrote:
- find . -xdev -depth $TEXPR $EXCEPT \
- ! -type d -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
+ find . -xdev -depth $TEXPR $EXCEPT ! -type d -delete
etc.
Petter Reinholdtsen replied:
I would prefer it if the current sysvinit package
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006, Thomas Hood wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen replied:
I would prefer it if the current sysvinit package did not have any
dependenices missing in debian/stable, to make it easier to backport
the package to sarge. Please wait with this change until etch is
released.
That
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:33:33PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Is -delete is no slower than the current -print0 | xargs rm code?
I'll assume so.
The -delete action corresponds to a direct call to unlink. Therefore
it is faster than the -print0 | xargs method. In theory on
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It might be a bit slower (extra fork, pipe setup), but it won't make much
of a difference, either way. I doubt it is in the easily measurable land.
If there were an extra process _per file_ then it could make a big difference
for the worse. However, I
4 matches
Mail list logo
